the “i wouldn’t trust them for shit” instinct 🚨🤡💫
“i wouldn’t
trust them for shit”
—instinct
is the baseline,
not extreme.
if you don’t have it?
seems like
that means you think
this shit is
totally chill
and acceptable behavior.
—
like, we’re depicting a normal ethical filter:
🤡 if i learn someone is lying to their spouse → i question their honesty
🤡 if i learn someone is using drugs regularly → i question their judgment
🤡 if i learn fucking both → i do not put them in charge of finances, compliance, or vulnerable people
—
sweetie,
that’s not
god-tier moralities.
that’s basic-ass
risk management.
—
🚨
if homie is a liar??
bro is a goddamn liability.
—
so when the opposite happens —
when the whole squad:
🔥 keeps access
🔥 keeps proximity
🔥 keeps authority
🔥 keeps protection
the reasonable inference
is not “oops, ignorance.”
it’s:
🤡
“oh shit—
this behavior
is either fucking
☠️ normalized,
☠️ minimized, or
☠️ strategically goddamn ignored.”
—
but
listen…
that little voice
inside my head,
just keeps saying—
❌❌❌
“i don’t know a
single good-faith person
who would be okay
knowing this shit
and not thinking it mattered.”
🤡🚨
babe!
that’s the goddamn floor
of ethical standards.
—
a genuinely good-faith leader,
upon learning:
🚨 cheating
🚨 drug use
🚨 fucking instability
would either:
intervene
document something
terminate goddamn access
inform affected parties
doing none
of those things??
and then staying silent??
is not neutral.
—
it’s a choice, baby.
🐍💫
