i was not the f✶cking one.
⚠️ legal notice + survivor disclosure ⚠️
this site documents my real-time survival as a domestic violence victim, whistleblower, and single mom—samantha lowe. i am currently navigating active safety threats, institutional neglect, and retaliatory surveillance.
i’ve tried to handle this privately.
i was ignored.
if you are accessing this site in a legal, professional, or retaliatory capacity, you are on notice: this may constitute constructive misconduct, witness intimidation, or bad faith surveillance of a protected party.
i am the only person protecting my child.
i am the only person protecting myself.
i’m not being dramatic—i’m being thorough.
this is what survival looks like when no one steps in.
i see you.
and i’m documenting back.
i am not a lawyer.
(in fact, i kinda read slow)
my position & invitation to clarify: this page is not intended to harass, threaten, or incite others against anyone. it is a factual record, based on documentation and witness statements, created because there is no professional contact channel left open. if any fact stated here is wrong, i want it corrected — immediately.
if anyone involved provides documentation disproving any point, i will update this record. please email me at: sam.vetrano@gmail.com for corrections.
✶ casefile: breach, babe
sam lowe (plaintiff)
vs.
northwestern mutual et al.
filed under:
the part where they assigned my husband’s work girlfriend to manage my finances during an active domestic violence emergency, erased me, failed to disclose a conflict, and then acted confused when i got litigious.
let me be clear:
northwestern mutual’s silence and concealment didn’t just protect my husband—they prolonged my abuse and enabled him to financially devastate me. by intentionally portraying the relationship between my financial representative / his co-worker and my husband as entirely professional, they induced me to remain financially entangled in a marriage marked by coercion, disloyalty, financial exploitation, and domestic violence. had i been informed of the advisor’s conflict of interest at any point—while she was actively managing my policies and maintaining proximity to my husband, who i continued to financially support throughout our marriage—i would have made radically different choices to protect myself and my child.
instead, it wasn’t until after i had fled the state, secured a restraining order, and was living alone after relocating again—across the country due to violence- that northwestern mutual admitted, retroactively, that there had apparently been a conflict of interest all along. by then, the damage was done: i had funded a man through his career and my pregnancy, who was in an unprofessional relationship with a female coworker—visibly, the entire time. i had paid for policies i did not own, that they enrolled me in during active labor, as the sole provider of our family, after my husband quit their firm. then—i lost all access to coverage affecting my daughter in full as i was actively still paying, and was taken off a policy as beneficiary while they openly acknowleged i was soley funding under duress and a protective order—while i was left to discover that my trust in their fiduciary duty had been completely misplaced. they never had my best interests in mind, only my abuser and his inappropriate, emotional and financial affair partner who they knowingly assigned to my account before stripping me of access—who both formally worked at their firm together.
this wasn’t a clerical oversight—it was institutional betrayal that placed me at continued risk and caused enduring material, physical, and emotional harm.
alleged claims include:
→ breach of fiduciary duty (plural)
→ constructive fraud (hi, colorado § 13-21-102)
→ negligent supervision (compliance team, you were sleeping)
→ aiding + abetting domestic violence (crs § 18-1-603)
→ intentional infliction of emotional distress (on brand)
→ unjust enrichment
→ retaliation after dv disclosure (crs §§ 13-21-131 + 18-8-706)
→ unauthorized alteration of ownership + beneficiary rights (crs § 10-3-111)
→ unfair insurance practices (crs § 10-3-1104)
✶
disclaimer:
i am not a lawyer.
i’ve taken some intro law classes and learned enough to know this is beyond fucked. i’m doing this because i literally have to—no other choice.
*all statements here are based on documented facts and firsthand records.

“they fucked around and forgot they were fucking fiduciaries.”
✶
a fiduciary is someone who has a legal obligation to act in the best interest of another person. not just "try their best" or "be nice" — legally bound to put your interests first. even above their own.
it's a relationship built on trust, vulnerability, and power imbalance.
so the law treats it seriously.
legally, this means they must:
act loyally → they can’t secretly favor someone else, especially someone paying them or sleeping with them.
act carefully → they have to know what they’re doing, and do it responsibly.
disclose conflicts → anything that could compromise their judgment has to be shared up front.
avoid self-dealing → they can’t use your account or situation to benefit themselves or their little office clique.
be accountable → they must document and explain decisions, especially around money
✶
what is a fucking fudiciary?
☠︎ what they owed me, legally (lol)
duty of loyalty
→ financial reps are required to act in the best interest of the client.
Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 8.01–8.03
also basic ethics, but whatever lol
duty of care
→ advisors must act with the care, skill, and diligence that a reasonably prudent person would exercise.
see: literally any fiduciary standard ever written
duty of disclosure
→ material conflicts of interest must be disclosed.
→ such as:
• private payments
• off-platform contact
• strategic personal ties
• weird “awkward” relationships
C.R.S. § 10-3-1104 (Unfair Insurance Practices)
duty to account
→ premium payments made by the client must be properly tracked and applied.
→ the person paying should remain… involved.
C.R.S. § 10-2-704 (Fiduciary Funds Rule)
also known as: don’t steal from your client, bro
duty to mitigate conflicts
→ firms must identify and mitigate advisor-client conflicts under SEC Reg BI.
Reg BI Release No. 34–86031, FINRA Rule 3270
duty to notify
→ if policy ownership, beneficiary status, or advisory representation changes, the client should be told.
→ lol
C.R.S. § 10-3-111 (Unauthorized Alteration of Contracts)
lol ok
duty not to retaliate
→ firms are not allowed to retaliate against clients who raise concerns, especially related to abuse or fraud.
→ also: dumb.
15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(A) (SEC Whistleblower Protection)
C.R.S. § 13-21-131 (Retaliation Against Crime Victims)

i almost died.
northwestern mutual denver knowingly (or absolutely should have known) assigned a financially conflicted office goblin—who was venmoing my husband and facetiming him through dv—to advise me on life insurance while i was nine months pregnant, funding everything alone, and dodging strangulation attempts.
bro—they let her onboard me, kept her assigned to our family’s file while i paid every single premium—his policy, my policy, our baby’s. and then? they let him remove me as his beneficiary, ghosted my ownership of the child’s policy, and later claimed—on record—that i was “never the owner” of either, just “the payer.” like that’s legally meaningless.
my guy—is this not your job? why did i have to look up the law to know an entire financial fucking firm was screwing me?
yo, y’all are fired. terrible work.
for real this shit is run like fudiciaries for dummies—i submitted my kid’s medical paperwork, got confirmation emails in my name, paid $200+ in january alone to ensure the policies remained active, received payment reminders from them in february, and was actively discussing billing with my new rep the whole time. if you accept my money, confirm receipt, and bill me again—i have rights.
wtf? again—my fiduciaries, why am i doing your job?
you don’t get to pocket the cash and pretend i was never here. but that’s exactly what they did. and when i asked for answers? bro—they’re hitting me with “your rep is on PTO, so kindly fuck off”
my guy—
this wasn’t a misunderstanding.it was coordinated policy sabotage during a domestic violence crisis by a firm that ran its compliance department like a frat basement.
and when i reported my shitshow? babe—they called me hostile. yo, i didn’t lose access—i was financially fucked by fiduciary clowns who mistook nepotism for ethics and forgot that i keep receipts and file federal complaints for fun.
why am i mad?
if i find out this firm or my reps aided and abetted in my near-death experience and financial ruin?
(while internally mocking me as i bought policies?)
lol.
(!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
i’m gunna burn
everything
fucking
down.
(figuratively)
because we almost fucking died
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
current status?
*unconfirmed
i want it to be said
so fucking loudly:
this is what potentially happens when firms normalize in-office fucking trysts as “team bonding,” forget they’re fucking fiduciaries, and hand over financial control to someone emotionally emeshed with your legal husband while you’re being increasingly beaten and paying every bill.
listen: they do not give, a single fuck.
they oversaw a pregnant woman get financially devastated, physically assaulted, and quietly erased from her own legal documents—even after she reported it.
and babe—they still somehow appear to think they have done nothing wrong. like fucking toddlers with access to bank accounts.

✶ sec whistleblower disclaimer ✶
pursuant to the dodd-frank wall street reform
and consumer protection act (15 u.s.c. § 78u–6),
i, samantha lee lowe, am a registered whistleblower complainant
with the u.s. securities and exchange commission (sec).
as of july 2025,
i have formally submitted a tips, complaints, and referrals (tcr) filing,
documented under record id: [4026199040],
concerning potential violations of securities law
and fiduciary misconduct by representatives of northwestern mutual denver.
this disclosure is protected by:
15 u.s.c. § 78u–6(h) → anti-retaliation provision
rule 21f-2(b)(1) under the securities exchange act → confidential whistleblower status
colorado rev. stat. § 24-50.5-101, et seq. → state whistleblower protections
retaliation against a whistleblower—whether through defamation, professional sabotage, policy tampering, or legal harassment—is expressly prohibited under federal and state law.
attempts to intimidate, silence, threaten, or retaliate against me in connection with this report will be:
added to the official SEC record,
forwarded to relevant enforcement offices,
included in my civil filings, and
promptly made public.
this is no bullshit. it’s a protected disclosure.
your best response is compliance.

✶ legal release: redactions, intent & protected disclosures ✶
this page contains information related to my official SEC whistleblower complaint (TCR #17524-664-607-685) and accompanying civil claims involving fiduciary misconduct, financial exploitation, and policy tampering connected to my role as a client and protected party.
redactions
i have intentionally redacted or abbreviated names to first and last initials where feasible—not out of obligation, but as a baseline of decency for people who extended me none.
this is not revenge.
this is the public record of my survival, documented on my terms, in my voice.
intent
my intent is not:
to stalk, dox, harass, or incite action against any specific person
to endanger anyone’s safety, employment, or family
to manufacture rumors or knowingly misstate fact
my intent is:
to ensure this story is not suppressed by power or privilege
to prevent future clients, survivors, or vulnerable parties from falling into the same legal trap
to protect the integrity of my whistleblower status under federal law
to create an accountable timeline of events rooted in documentation, not deflection
legal protections
this disclosure is protected under:
15 U.S.C. § 78u–6(h) (Dodd-Frank whistleblower retaliation clause)
First Amendment (U.S. Const. amend. I)
Fair report privilege (Gertz v. Welch)
Truth defense (NYT v. Sullivan)
Anti-SLAPP statutes in Colorado, California, New York, Texas, and Florida
bottom line
if you’re named, it’s because you were documented.
if you're uncomfortable, take it up with your conscience—or your compliance team.
any attempt to retaliate against me, legally or otherwise, will be considered:
a violation of federal whistleblower law
an addendum to my SEC file
grounds for additional civil action
this isn’t personal.
this is evidence.
and it’s legally protected.
factual corrections?
please contact me asap!